[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties

Subject: RE: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties
From: "Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paul.tupaczewski_@_alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:59:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0a9301cb3722$417c6c00$c4754400$@com>
References: <000501cb36ef$fc35f7b0$6400a8c0_@_paul> <57C1F4C7E6564E6F9756148EF9D04E6A@RailData> <0a9301cb3722$417c6c00$c4754400$@com>

> Chuck; Actually, I don't think it's a design issue since the 
> first run of PRR, Wabash and SP cars from October 2009 didn't 
> have this issue. For some reason, some, not all of this run 
> have the issue.

And a PRR friend of mine said the prototype had VERY tight tolerances (reportedly 1" between the flanges and the floor bottom), so that might have something to do with it.

	- Paul

	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties
  - From: Carl Gustafson <cgustafs_@_voicenet.com>

References:
- RE: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties
  - From: "Paul Brezicki" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>
- RE: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties
  - From: "Brian J Carlson" <prrk41361_@_yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (erielack) Railroad Sign
Next by Date: Re: (erielack) HO Tangent DL&W Gons - Rolling Properties
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread