[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Portage Bridge near Hornell (2)
IIRC, in 1997 and 1998 the bridge wasn't posted no trespassing, but when I
went back on the anniversary of dad's death in 1999 it had been posted by NS.
In 1997 when I was on the bridge with the train running across it, it seemed
quite stable and not shaky.
I walked the curve to the west and did seem pretty sharp, but not 10 mph
sharp.
Henry
J. Henry Priebe Jr. Blue Moon Internet Corp Network Administrator
www.bluemoon.net Internet Access & Web Hosting
www.railfan.net Railfan Network Services
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Todd Stearns wrote:
> Though you are correct Schuyler, it makes me wonder why there aren't alot of
> arrests due to the rampant trespassing. Lord knows if someone does get hurt,
> or worse, they or their families will have the lawyers all over NS. Yes, I
> have been there and know first hand how pervasive the problem is.
>
> Todd K. Stearns
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee_@_verizon.net>
> To: "'EL Mail List'" <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:29 AM
> Subject: RE: (erielack) Portage Bridge near Hornell (2)
>
>
> > Have you been there Bob? Your remark makes me think not. It's not a
> > matter of "occasionally."
> > It's a matter of every day, early morning to late at night, adults, kids,
> > LITTLE kids . . you're
> > ready to blow them away, because the railroad doesn't have to worry about
> > it?
> >
> > "that never brings with it speed restrictions, nor should it."
> >
> > Common sense, Bob, common sense.
> >
> > SGL
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------