[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
FW: RE: FW: CNJ Interchange; was: RE: (erielack) GL/Boonton, Lincoln Park Siding
- Subject: FW: RE: FW: CNJ Interchange; was: RE: (erielack) GL/Boonton, Lincoln Park Siding
- From: "Schuyler Larrabee" <schuyler.larrabee_@_verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 20:54:43 -0400
I forwarded this question to a friend in my model railroad club, who once worked for the NYC, and is
pretty knowledgeable about this stuff about routes. I've edited his reply a bit for brevity, and to
eliminate some stuff about the Chesapeake System, our club's model railroad. Anyhow . . .
>
> Schuyler Larrabee <schuyler.larrabee_@_verizon.net> wrote:
>
> * This is useful, thanks! Here's a question I've always wondered: Is there
> * a list of "standard routings" for the EL? Let's say a car has to get
> * from NJ to Decatur, IL - what was the most commonly used route? EL-
>
> This is another useful thing for modelers to put on car cards to let their crews
know how to move the
> cars.
> ===========
>
> Assuming we are talking about EL-WAB, tariff junctions would be Buffalo, Huntington
and Chicago.
> If you add NKP, then Cleveland would qualify.
>
> It's hard to say what would be "standard routings". For Decatur, EL's preferred junction
would be Chicago, for
> its long haul. Looking at it from the WAB point of view, Buffalo would be preferred. But for a
WAB empty, EL
> would prefer Buffalo and for an EL empty, WAB would prefer Chicago.
>
> But most loads were routed by shippers using what many of us referred to as service routes.
DL&W-Buffalo-
> WAB was probably a service route and probably remained one after the El merger.
ERIE-Huntington-WAB was a
> through route for mail cars, but was it a good service connection for freight ?
>
> Whether Chicago was a good service junction depends on volume. Connections that warranted
through blocks
> or had enough volume to drive a schedule had the better services that were not part of the famous
Chicago congestion
> picture.
>
> Go a bit further and look at southern IN and IL to St. Louis and beyond. Then you have
Buffalo, Dunkirk,
> Cleveland, Kent, Creston, Lima, Decatur, Huntington, Kingsland, Rochester and Chicago. Those in
bold are the routes
> shown as principle connections on the old Erie map. The only routes we are certain were service
routes are Buffalo and
> Chicago. Cleveland and Huntington seem like reasonable possibilities, being the only others that
are main line points for
> both railroads.
>
> Malcolm Laughlin
Via SGL
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------