When I worked for REA Express in their NYC E. 38th St. computer center c. 1963, I came across ICC regulations for shipping remains. It detailed the construction of an outer shipping container of wood, even as to the sizes of wood to be used and specifically the sizes of nails in various locations. And I may be mistaken on the detail here, but the regulation specified that the remains were to be carried head first, but positioned in the baggage or express car feet first (I may have the direction wrong, but the carrying direction and the travel direction were detailed in the reg.) I uysed this regulation in later MBA courses for papers on government regulation of business. I also gave the example to later classes that railroad management under the ICC was usually not very creative - they simply had to follow the pertinent ICC directives, and if none existed, petition the ICC to write a new directive. However, railroad management in my estimation became extremely creative in interpreting how to apply the often conflicting directives and get the trains running on time and the passengers and freight delivered to their destinations. It never ceased to amaze me that the ICC would concern itself with the construction of outer shipping containers for caskets and remains, even down to the size of the various nails used. REA shipped a lot of remains as they could most expeditiously deliver the containers to a funeral parlor. Rail shipped remains, like air shipped remains today, must be picked up by a mortuary at the station or airport, and I doubt if interline "baggage" agreements would have allowed transfer to another railroad. REA offered "one carrier service" anywhere. Every so often now you can see an obvious shipping container going up the conveyor belt into an airplane cargo hold. Joel McEachen EL List Daily wrote: >EL List Daily Tuesday, March 7 2006 Volume 03 : Number 1947 >>From Archives_@_Railfan.net >Message-ID: <1f1.4c72c9e2.313d69d0_@_aol.com> >Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:32:48 EST >From: VSX9000_@_aol.com >Subject: Re: (erielack) "Human Remains" in Consist > >In a message dated 3/5/2006 9:14:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, >MOEL_@_paonline.com writes: >>Were most stations equipped >>to handle human remains. Just wondering! > >I think the DL&W station in Scranton had a morgue.......I think it is the >bakery room now. >Lou > > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List > Sponsored by the ELH&TS > http://www.elhts.org > >------------------------------ > The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2008 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.