RE: (erielack) Strange Picks for models ?

["Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>]

Richard Young wrote:

> Sometimes I can't figure out why the model companies
> pick the models they do. Though the flats and rail
> inserters are neat subjects and of limited use and
> appeal on a layout they get cancelled for lack of 
> documentation. Where as subjects of high appeal that have not 
> been done don't get considered. I've suggested doing N1 or N3 
> Mikes and have plenty of documentation to support the project.
> 
> Even though they were done by NKP Models there were
> only 25 pieces of each of 4 versions totaling 100
> pieces and they were of questionable accuracy and
> porportions. Between two of the larger manufacturers
> (being 3rdRail/Sunset and Overland) both have come out
> with a rash of Erie/EL equipment in recent times and
> both show no interest in a project of this nature. 3rd
> Rail/ Sunset  does not want to do HO stuff and
> Overland I have not figured out.

Railworks is open to suggestions for models - they've done lots of DL&W
stuff before, and their steam (PRR models I've seen) is gorgeous. The secret
here is that the manufacturers want to sell what they make, especially for
high ticket items like brass steam. I would think that if enough people put
in advance orders with a reservation amount, most brass manufacturers would
do it.

The other issue is - how well would a certain brass model sell? There's a
tremendous outlay of money just for the initial engineering for a brass
model, and if the manufacturer can't recoup that cost, it's not worth it to
them. That's why small-run brass is fairly rare and/or expensive.

	- Paul

------------------------------