[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) NS vs. Shared Assets.... a bit off
- Subject: (erielack) NS vs. Shared Assets.... a bit off
- From: "STEVEZ10_@_aol.com"
- Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 11:49:38 EDT
I have a question for the list that I would like to address..............
I don't understand why most NJT lines that presently allow Conrail local
service will be Shared Assets area, however the line up by me referred to as
the "Washington Secondary" will be operated by pure NS. Is the reason
because the Washington Secondary feeds into Allentown? I would think that
Conrails local job that operates over NJTs Boonton line east would be Shared
Assets as well. The map however does not show this area as being "Shared
Assets"
Anyone know the reasoning behind all this?
Thanks,
Steve Pellettiere
------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net
------------------------------