[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) ALCO plant farewell
- Subject: Re: (erielack) ALCO plant farewell
- From: RJFlei_@_aol.com
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:46:22 EST
Ed,
Don't forget that Pittsburgh as part of ALCO, too as well as Brooks in
Dunkirk, NY.
Rick Fleischer
Cortland, OH.
In a message dated 12/10/2010 9:43:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
ETMontgomery_@_fcps.edu writes:
There were a lot of things that probably contributed to not reusing this
plant for heavy industry manufacturing. I'm wondering how up to date the
facility was when ALCO finally shut the doors. Were they operating on a
shoestring at the time. I've read a lot about Alco Products on this site and
it appeared as though their quality control wasn't very good. GE just made
a locomotive that was better than ALCO so it could compete with EMD.
Montreal Locomotive Works continued with the ALCO design for some years beyond
ALCO's closing but I don't believe they ever tried to compete in the US
market.
Secondly, the tax rates imposed on businesses in New York State may have
contributed to other locomotive manufacturers and remanufacturers to avoid
what might have been an excellent site location.
It was sad to see how ALCO kept consolidating. My uncle told me of how
Cooke was still making engines in Paterson in the 1920s. Alco acquired them,
Rogers, Richmond, and others and centered the manufacturing in New York.
Here's an off topic question: when did the name American Locomotive Company
come into Being? ALCO must have been one of the earliest acronyms around.
Ed Montgomery
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------