[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Re: CNJ Interchange
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Re: CNJ Interchange
- From: "Paul Brezicki" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:12:37 -0400
Jim,
None of the consists from 1975-76 show any cars routed EL-CNJ-EL, and
frankly, I'm dubious that this ever happened unless it was perhaps a
stop-off car. Do you happen to know of any examples?
Paul B
From: "Jim Guthrie" <jguthrie_@_pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: (erielack) Re: CNJ Interchange
> Jim, I'm not sure what you mean here. SE-98 was made up of cars consigned
> to customers on the CNJ, not EL. Lake Jct replaced the interchange at
> Taylor when CNJ quit PA. Both locations were logical interchange points
> since they were (more or less) end points of CNJ at their respective
> times. If you're arguing that CNJ shouldn't have existed at all in the EL
> era, I can't agree more, but that's another topic and Conrail took care of
> that redundancy.
Paul --
Traffic destined for CNJ points makes sense, of course, as would westbound
traffic from the CNJ.
But I'm suggesting that interchanging cars to the CNJ at either location --
just to have the CNJ hand the freight back at Weehawken -- is typical of
boneheaded railroading throw-cash-down-the-toilet railroading.
Cheers,
Jim
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------