[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) List Address
- Subject: RE: (erielack) List Address
- From: "Joe K." <joesk_@_ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:05:14 -0500
- In-Reply-To: <DC2BEFDBADE96340A55D7803C4EDAB276C0C54_@_ILEXC1U03.ndc.lucen t.com>
- References: <009a01c7524c$fde872d0$0202a8c0_@_MIKADO> <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070217102643.28892B-100000@net.bluemoon.net> <DC2BEFDBADE96340A55D7803C4EDAB276C0C54@ILEXC1U03.ndc.lucent.com>
At 11:31 AM 2/19/2007, Paul Tupaczewski wrote:
>I'm all for whatever the list majority wants to see - we just haven't
>gotten too many complaints about this until recently.
>
>If no one is vehemently against the idea, I suggest we change the list
>mechanism so that "Reply" replies to the LIST, not the individual. What
>say everyone?
>
> - Paul
That's fine with me for whatever my own opinion is worth. It's not a
big deal to cut and paste a different address if someone wants to
send to an individual, but considering the difficulty some people
have over deleting the repetitious portions of replied-to emails,
there may objections from some.
Just my opinion,
Joe K.
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------