RE: (erielack) List Address

["Tupaczewski, Paul R \(Paul\)" <paultup_@_alcatel-lucent.com>]

I'm all for whatever the list majority wants to see - we just haven't
gotten too many complaints about this until recently.

If no one is vehemently against the idea, I suggest we change the list
mechanism so that "Reply" replies to the LIST, not the individual. What
say everyone?

	- Paul

 

> Schuyler,
> 
> That wasn't my choice, I was instructed to set it up that way 
> as that's how it was setup when Rob S. hosted it on 
> Internexxus way back when. I have always preferred a 
> Reply-to: list address header and that's how our other lists 
> are set up. There are list members who would raise Cain if we 
> changed the status quo now. I have no problem teaching old 
> dogs new tricks, the same doesn't seem to apply to human 
> beans! Paul T. is the official list owner, I have to pass the 
> buck on this one. I'm just the lackey who does as he's told.
> 
> I hate getting two and sometimes three duplicate replies to 
> not only my own posts, but to any that are written by some 
> list members who have broken mailers that INSIST on injecting 
> erielack-owner@ into the list of recipients for some totally 
> incomprehensible reason. If it had been up to me, we would 
> have had a Reply-to: long ago.
> 
> Henry

	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org
	To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------