Re: (erielack) NJT PL42

[bill guimes <vze3fhdr_@_verizon.net>]

Additionally part 1, unless you are a NJT employee who has a monetary 
interest in said locomotive, why would you care?

Additionally part 2, unless you are Alstom, why would you care?

Additionally part 3, technically, they're not late. The locomotives had 
to have had been delivered before 12/31/04 to be exempt from Category II 
emissions. The first two were completed and running before that date. 
The only modifications made were of an ergonomic nature, and in no way 
affected the performance of the locomotive. And, we suspect that if the 
locomotives, or at least one, had not been running before 12/31/04, the 
FRA/EPA would have granted an exemption from Category II emissions.

Additionally part 4, NJT trains are running fine without them, so why do 
you care?

Bill

Steven Kay wrote:
> Late for what?
> 
> Steve
> 
>


>>
>>SIX MONTHS LATE.
>>
>>Gary R. Kazin
>>DL&W Milepost R35.7
>>Rockaway, New Jersey
>>
>>http://www.geocities.com/gkazin/index.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday!
>>Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web
>>http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

- -- 
Be a Locomotive Engineer:
Its the most fun you can have with 3000 HP

------------------------------