RE: (erielack) More MOW thoughts...

["Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>]

Chris,

	In this case, look at my other message: This was a BRASS piece of
limited demand - that's why a manufacturer would cancel it: not enough
people wanted one! :(

	- Paul



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Thurner [mailto:chris.thurner_@_adelphia.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 4:30 PM
> To: Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)
> Cc: Mailgroup (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: (erielack) More MOW thoughts...
> 
> 
> I agree Paul.  I was just commenting on why a manufacturer 
> would cancel a model like the rail machine.
> 
> I find MOW to be some of the most interesting and unique 
> pieces on a layout. I too was quite pleased when Walthers 
> release the test car and the Russell snowplow (I have 3, 1 
> factory dec PRR and 2 dec by Moi in EL).  I also liked their 
> Am loco crane (even with the lousy mechanism) and their 
> dynamometer cars (both I don't believe are correct or can 
> easily be done in any list-relevant manner).  I give Walthers 
> a lot of credit for releasing this type of equipment 
> (although a lot of it isn't in types relevant to the list) 
> and hope they release more in the future.
> 
> Chris

------------------------------