[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) H&M to GCT, was PATH question
- Subject: Re: (erielack) H&M to GCT, was PATH question
- From: "Schuyler G Larrabee" <"sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com">
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 23:03:04 -0400
I will reply even though you are quite rude. Ignorance can make you that
way, and maybe some education will ameliorate that.
> Would you kindly tell us how a 72' Erie Stillwell and 10' wide would fit
in
> the NH tunnels?
I assume that youi meant H&M? I don't believe anyone here said that it'd be
done with 72' x 10' Stillwells
>Can you tell us the source where you heard or read this.
Certainly, I know enough to do some research before I speak. Railway
Gazette, Volume 44, page 323.
> As far as Erie NY area electrification, it was to go Jersey City-Port
Jervis.
And my I know the source of that information, please? That is not what I
have heard. Or read.
> There is nothing or Erie and the H&M other thjan maybe through ticketing.
That's been mentioned here tonight.
>Oh yeah, NYC would have permitted Erie into GCT.
Again, nobody said that it would be on NYC tracks, and secondly, since Mr
Morgan owned them both . . .
> I guess the O&W was also an early user of dual mode RDC's too
REALLY??? I never heard that one before! 8^)
Be a little more courteous, if you don't mind.
SGL
------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net
------------------------------