Re: (erielack) H&M to GCT, was PATH question

["Schuyler G Larrabee" <"sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com">]

Mike has been paying attention . . .

Think NY,W&B . . .

SGL
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <"MDelvec952_@_aol.com">
To: <"sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com">; <JACK5008@webtv.net>; <rpgillis@bellatlantic.net>
Cc: <"STGCOMM_@_aol.com">; <ERIE-LACKAWANNA@prodigy.net>;
<"erielack_@_internexus.net">
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: (erielack) H&M to GCT, was PATH question


> In a message dated 6/26/00 9:34:40 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> "sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com" writes:
>
> > Mmmm-hmmm.  'N'y'know, don't you, that the Erie was going to run it's
> >  electrified suburban service into the H&M up to GCT. No, I am _not_
> smoking anything.  It is true.  There was an agreement between the Erie
and
> the H&M to permit this to happen. <
>
> Wonder if this scheme has anything to do with why the Stillwells look so
much
> like the early H&M cars.  A "family" apperance of rolling stock was quite
the
> tradition in that era.  The Stillwells looked like a steam-road version of
> the original H&M tubes cars.  Hmmmm.
>
>                            ....Mike
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net


 ------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net

------------------------------