This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to "mime_@_docserver.cac.washington.edu" for more info. - --part1_0.93421380.25768e68_boundary Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: <"Pine.OSF.3.951MOON.991201100611.9369J_@_net.bluemoon.net"> On Wed, 1 Dec 1999 "STEVEZ10_@_aol.com" wrote: > I got this letter from a friend and I thought it should be read by some of > the EL list users. > It was very well written! In reference to the NS flag waver's open letter, while he has a few valid journalistic points, it does not erase the fact that NS has not only provided poor rail service since the CR absorbtion, but also has stirred up quite a bit of animosity in the ranks of ex-CR employees at all levels. I just got through reading a first person account of the mess they created at Enola/Hbg. with their clueless "overseers" (word used in last email I read on it) calling the shots and ignoring the tried and true methods of the locally familiar workforce. Apparently the "overseers" have departed Enola and things are running more smoothly there now. That's just a typical example of NS arrogance which certainly has existed on ex-CR lines since the split. Addressing the lack of coverage of the CSX West Shore congestion, it has been covered by several sources, but it is well known that NS has suffered far greater setbacks in their integration plan than CSX has. That is due in no small part to NS methodology, but in all fairness to NS, demographics has been a large factor in their integration problems. Their pieces of the CR pie don't lend themselves to as smooth an integration of services quite as well as CSX' and that has also been discussed at length in print. While corporate pride can be a good thing it can also be a source of subjective viewpoints. I think that the fact that the vast majority of ex-CR workers bid on positions with CSX (it was something akin to rats fleeing from a sinking ship!) says a lot about NS management's relationships with their workforce and corporate philosophy. This has been improving, from an employee standpoint, in recent months and is also well documented in the press. Ranting about journalistic license will not erase the problems from which NS has suffered and from which NS is still suffering. A corporate culture like NS' does not change overnight and their upper echelon's resistance to an obvious need for change and their PR spin doctors do not facilitate matters. Interestingly, the poster's distaste for application of the term "arrogance" to NS' handling of their ex-CR properties (a la Uncle Pete :) is in itself an example of such arrogance within the ranks of NS management. NS' failure to embrace the natural need for corporate evolution in order to maintain homeostasis within a vastly changed and much larger railroad system has set them back many months, if not years, in their quest for a smoothly functioning business model. I have no doubt that NS will recover and once again elevate themselves to a high level of corporate excellence, but at what cost to those who have put their hearts and souls into making CR the success story it has become? It is without a doubt a painful lesson, one which NS has not quite finished learning yet... J. Henry Priebe Jr. Blue Moon President & Network Administrator "root_@_bluemoon.net" net.bluemoon.net - Blue Moon Online System V.90, X2 & K56flex www.railfan.net - The Railfan Network http://www.bluemoon.net mud.bluemoon.net 4000 - MoonMUD bbs.bluemoon.net irc.bluemoon.net - ZUHnet Buffalo, NY IRC Server - --part1_0.93421380.25768e68_boundary-- ------------------------------------------------------------ Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.