[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(rshsdepot) Re: Sacramento, CA station
- Subject: (rshsdepot) Re: Sacramento, CA station
- From: CoolGuy127_@_aol.com
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:37:18 EDT
The attached article from the Sacramento Bee reports on a visit by people
-From Sacramento to Washington Union Station and their observations on how the
very successful experience in Washington can be duplicated in Sacramento.
Daniel Chazin
Teaneck, NJ
http://www.sacbee.com/news/news/local06_20010520.html
Union Station success a model: Sacramento officials are dazzled by the D.C.
depot's renewal.
By David Whitney
Bee Washington Bureau
(Published May 20, 2001)
WASHINGTON -- Midafternoon is slack time at Union Station, but the grand
halls still are bustling. The din of commerce echoes from high-arched
ceilings that harken back a century to an opulent era when trains were at the
top of the transportation hierarchy. Over a distant speaker, an announcer
calls passengers to Amtrak's popular Metroliner train, which leaves hourly
for New York City, but there is no evident rush toward the train platforms.
Most people are not here because they are going somewhere. Union Station is
their destination, a shopping mall with 130 stores and restaurants.
This is where Sacramento officials have found inspiration for the city's
downtown train depot. They say the Mediterranean-style depot at Fifth and I
streets, with its burnt-orange brick facade and cathedral-style windows, is a
diamond in the rough, just as Washington's now dazzling landmark was before
the right alchemy was found to turn it into a crown jewel for the nation's
capital.
"Union Station is a very good model," said Sacramento Mayor Heather Fargo,
who was in Washington earlier this month with other city officials and toured
the station for ideas.
Fargo said the way in which developers seamlessly melded new construction and
the historic Union Station is something she would like to replicate in
restoring the old Sacramento depot, which is listed on the National Register
of Historic Places. On Tuesday, the Sacramento City Council is expected to
take the first formal steps toward that goal.
"They extended the new part onto Union Station in a way that complements it
and doesn't compete," Fargo said. "What strikes me most when I'm there is the
level of activity. It's such a hub. It buzzes with enthusiasm and excitement.
People are in the mood for adventure when they are there. That's the kind of
mood I'd like us to have in our downtown."
Union Pacific attorney Roy Brewer said he agrees Union Station is "a great
model" for a multiple-use depot that could be "a destination for people other
than just the traveler, a place Sacramentans want to take people to show it
off."
Fargo said Sacramento's plan would involve building an annex or concourse on
the back side of the depot, but the design is in flux. Also not firmly
decided is whether the existing tracks would be moved a block north in order
to accommodate a larger annex with more shops and restaurants, airy waiting
areas and more open spaces.
"This is probably the most important planning decision the city has before it
right now," Fargo said.
Councilman Steve Cohn, the council's leading transportation expert, said the
concepts that have made Union Station a success are "something that would
make sense for us in Sacramento."
It would be preposterous to think that Sacramento could convert its much
smaller brick-and-mortar depot into something as grand as the Romanesque
granite and marble Union Station, he said. But by borrowing some of the
design principles, Cohn said, the Sacramento depot could become the gateway
to a transportation center that also serves as a draw to downtown office
workers, city dwellers and tourists.
Fargo has gotten railroad officials and preservationists to agree to maintain
the old depot as the grand entrance to an "intermodal" transportation center,
a place where trains, buses and light rail would converge. Union Pacific and
Amtrak officials previously said they wanted a new station north of the
depot. Preservationists opposed that.
-From the rear of the depot, an enclosed annex would be added, perhaps using
lots of glass and maybe including a second story flanking a central corridor.
The annex would focus on a view to the north and the old railroad shops that
would be converted into a train technology museum. That view would complete
the "feel" of the new complex's connection to its historic setting.
Along one side of the annex, a light-rail station would be constructed, and
in a place yet to be determined a new bus-loading area would be built so that
idling buses are convenient, but out of the way of pedestrians and other
traffic. The effect would be to leave the I Street entrance open and
uncluttered, drawing in pedestrians to the eateries, watering holes and shops
in the complex.
"The historic depot has to be part of the intermodal station," said
Councilwoman Lauren Hammond. "There's no way it should be separated. We can't
ignore our history. We should celebrate it."
The idea of moving the tracks north a block is controversial.
Many preservationists argue the tracks should remain in their historic
position. Some have raised concerns about moving the tracks and forcing
passengers to walk much farther, separating them from the downtown core.
But Cohn, who believes strongly that the tracks need to be moved, said Union
Station proves that distance is not an obstacle when there are shops and
restaurants to give commuters something to do while they wait.
"The key is not how far we're moving the tracks," he said. "The key is how
passengers get to them."
Initially, planners thought that an open-air plaza between the old depot and
the new train concourse might be the way to go.
But Fargo and Cohn said the magic of Union Station is that everything is
protected from the weather in a seamless structure that has the rich feel of
historical significance.
"Now, we are starting to appreciate the notion that we need an extension of
the depot, an annex, that is indoors," Cohn said. "And by having the retail
space, you generate revenues to help pay for the restoration."
That certainly has been the experience at Union Station, said Bob Mauer, vice
president of Jones Lang LaSalle, which helped redevelop the station and is
the leasing agent.
"The No. 1 reason people come to Union Station is not to take a train or bus,
but to eat," he said. "We have one of the highest sales-per-square-foot of
any retail outlet in the country. We are 98 percent occupied, and we have a
list of people who want to be in Union Station."
But as in Sacramento, Union Station's redevelopment had its detractors.
"The majority of people were naysayers to this project," Mauer said. "They
thought it would fail miserably, that it would never sustain itself.
"But within a year it was turning a profit. And I think everyone was amazed
that a train station so fallen into disrepair could be restored into an urban
center and have such economic vitality."
------------------------------