[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) DL&W 959

Subject: Re: (erielack) DL&W 959
From: "toddsyr" <toddsyr_@_twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:43:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2098087559.217593.1291129940643.JavaMail.root_@_sz0032a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>
References: <2098087559.217593.1291129940643.JavaMail.root_@_sz0032a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net>

Your enthusiasm is appreciated Tony. The more the better!

Todd K. Stearns

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: <tonyhorn1_@_comcast.net>
To: "EL Mail List" <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: (erielack) DL&W 959


>
> I think it would be a good idea to make it cosmetically into what it 
> looked like as an EL unit. Yes, I am still voting for gmy!
>
> Tony


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5656 (20101128) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com




	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------

References:
- Re: (erielack) DL&W 959
  - From: tonyhorn1_@_comcast.net

Prev by Date: Re: (erielack) DL&W 959
Next by Date: Re: (erielack) Re: An EL Geep, was: DL&W 959
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread