[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) track plan advice?



Brad Butcher wrote:


> True I had thought of that, but my reading had tainted my 
> opinions. In McCelland's book for his origional layout, he 
> talks about using numerous #4's, 5's & 6's, but later saying 
> he replaced many #4's after haveing alot of problems with 
> operation with them and that in hindsight he would use #6's 
> as the minimum. Then in the article about the 2nd incarnation 
> of the V&O he started in the early 2000's he talks about 
> using #8's as a minimum on mainline turnouts and yard tracks, 
> with some #6's for industries. I had come to have this 
> philosophy after reading this and the other books by 
> Armstrong and Koestner (spelling? I'm at work) didn't refute 
> this idea. But as you say, a #6 straight may actually be more 
> operationally effecient then a #8 compound, I will look into 
> it. Thanks for the idea :)
 
I highly recommend #8 minimum for all your mainline turnouts/crossovers.
#6 turnouts off the main for industries would suffice.

The bigger the turnouts, the better. Lister Joe Braun has some
staggeringly HUGE turnouts (Joe, what's that one crossover you have - a
pair of #18 turnouts?). They operate great and trains look awesome
running through them - but boy, do they eat up the layout space!  



> Yeah I had heard something about this, as well as atlas 
> #4.5's. I am using Walthers as a basis, which I believe are 
> shinosura's. I've heard good things about micro engineerings 
> track and turnouts, but the paramater file for them is 
> limited to just 4's & 6's. 
 

I'm not sure about XTrkCAD, but 3rd Planit has a full library of various
vendors' track components, so when you design with them, you will know
exactly the correct orientation of all the pieces.


  
 
> Good advice about couplers and wheelsets. I must confess to a 
> bit of ignorance on that subject. I have known about Kadee 
> couplers since I was a kid, but I really don't understand the 
> different sizes and what they mean. Nor the nuances of other 
> brands either. Unfortunately I don't think this is a subject 
> I will really be able to wrap my mind around until I get some 
> hands on time if you know what I mean? Some things are just 
> better to have someone show you then talk about.

In a nutshell:

"Standard" Kadee: #5
"Scale Head" version of the #5: #58
There's also the "whisker" version of the #58 (I believe it's the #158)
where you don't need that bronze coupler centering spring that you drop
into the coupler pocket.

All else are variants of the above. :)  Kadee's website describes them
well.

	- Paul

	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------