[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) ore trains,
- Subject: Re: (erielack) ore trains,
- From: RJFlei_@_aol.com
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:20:55 EDT
Brad,
I'd like to take a shot at your question.
Some things to consider.
The Erie/EL was pretty well financially strapped since the 1950's. The
Erie, since the era of the robber barons. They probably found themselves with a
lot of hoppers on hand due to the decline in coal industry. So why spend
the money on specialized equipment that couldn't be used for anything else?
I'm thinking that the EL's ore facilities were nearing obsolescense and
that ore would probably be handled at other facilities.
This was also the era of the beginning of the decline of the steel
industry. The EL's ore movements to the Mahoning Valley was probably most of the
extent this kind of service on the railroad unless there was some in Buffalo
or on some former Lackawanna lines. Anybody know?
The EL's ore trains operating to Youngstown and Warren were in their last
days because steel mills located away from water transportation are at a
competitive disadvantage when compared to mills located on the Great Lakes or
other sources of water transportation.
This is the reason that Mahoning Valley Congressman, Mike Kirwan. was
behind an effort to build a lake to river canal from Ashtabula to the Ohio River
which would have benefited mills in the Youngstown Steel District. Only
trouble is that a large portion of Ashtabula County in Ohio would have been
flooded to provide a reservoir to supply the canal with water and the mills
were already somewhat obsolete.
Any other ideas out there?
Rick Fleischer
Cortland, OH.
**************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the
web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------