Pat, You're correct, the 3 UPS trains were TOFC-only, but frequently handled other traffic on weekend arrivals. Check out the tables in my UPS article for some examples. I guess I'll copy my response to Joe Braun, which has more detail on this topic. See below. Paul B From: pat.moore_@_att.net Subject: EL piggyback trains (was: (erielack) UPS trailers again) Hi Joe, Oh yeah, by the mid-70s the EL ran solid piggyback trains on a routine basis. Paul B...correct me if I am wrong...but it would be a rare occurrence for trains like 2/NY-100 and A/CX-99 to be anything BUT solid piggyback? - - -pat moore Yes, absolutely, beginning in the mid-60's. Prior to that, the hot 99/100 trains generally had forwarder and other boxcar traffic. 100 also carried livestock for Chester NY and auto parts out of Akron for Ford-Mahwah. By the late 60's the eastbound forwarder boxcars had more or less disappeared, so the primary EB TOFC trains PB-100, NY-100 and Advance-100 were pure TOFC. Westbound, NY-99 continued to handle boxcars for Lifschultz FF out of 28th St Manhattan until that facility closed. This was related to the fact that carload traffic on EL was primarily EB, so EL gave Lifschultz a very favorable rate to fill some of those MT boxcars headed back west. After that facility (and 14th St Chicago) closed and Lifschultz went all-TOFC in 10/75, NY-99 often handled boxcars for LA Wholesale to LA and the Bay area via ATSF, and for JC Penney to various western locations via BN, which had the Penney account. PB-99/100 were all-TOFC, at least on EL's portion, until late 1974 when the severe traffic downturn resulted in that pair being combined with carload trains TC-99/100. The Cannonballs between Croxton and E St Louis via N&W were mostly TOFC, but often carried some hot boxcar traffic. Finally the UPS trains A/CX-99, CX-99 and 2/NY-100 were all-TOFC, although trains arriving on weekends often filled out with auto parts, since they could arrive very late and stilll make service. Paul - --- On Fri, 2/27/09, Joseph A. Braun <joebraun_@_optonline.net> wrote: From: Joseph A. Braun <joebraun_@_optonline.net> Subject: UPS trailers again To: "'Paul Brezicki'" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>, "'EL Mailing List'" <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net> Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 12:00 PM Paul B, thanks for your usual very helpful feedback. Let me just pose one more specific ancillary question for final clarification while the topic is on our minds. From your knowledge of train consists, would EL have ever run a freight that was 100% pig flats (assuming also a preponderance of the UPS trailers)? Thanks -- in the interest of "good enough" modelling that also does not want to create the preposterous! Joe Braun The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List http://EL-List.railfan.net/ To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.