[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: (erielack) Extended Commuter Service



Always saw in any rail line ripped up and then proposed back to Trails To Rails, it is never this and gone forever with rail Never relaid. In case of mileage of Cut-off, this is a No No. That is what they have Route 80 for that sees more traffic than the Cut-Off!!
 
Jerome

- --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Montgomery, Edward T <Edward.Montgomery_@_fcps.edu> wrote:

From: Montgomery, Edward T <Edward.Montgomery_@_fcps.edu>
Subject: RE: (erielack) Extended Commuter Service
To: eldispatcher72_@_yahoo.com, "EL Mail List" <erielack@lists.railfan.net>
Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 9:51 AM

Well, it does have a lot to do with whether funding for the restoration
of the cut-off is ever carried out.  That is why I advocate some form of
agreement with NS to develop freight traffic to justify re-establishing
the line.  If New Jersey is serious about this, then they should be
looking for some kind of business/state arrangement to justify
reinstating the rail line.

Ed Montgomery 


	

	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html





	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	http://EL-List.railfan.net/
	To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html

------------------------------