[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) What is wrong with this picture?
- Subject: RE: (erielack) What is wrong with this picture?
- From: "Paul R. Tupaczewski" <paultup_@_comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:07:43 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <008701c8f9ba$47285d00$d5791700$@larrabee_@_verizon.net>
- References: <BAY121-W114E2D1179667784FD8301C3740_@_phx.gbl> <06FC178E2D61483EBBD21A5E8C33D487@PAULPC> <000101c8f916$a90234f0$fb069ed0$@larrabee@verizon.net> <835CA20950CB4688B6EE7E7D71569CE4@PAULPC> <008701c8f9ba$47285d00$d5791700$@larrabee@verizon.net>
> > First off, that photo is so small, how can you really tell?
> >
> > And attached is an example of another wreck repair - this one is
> > missing the "wing" to the left of the nose door. A similar
> "effect" as
> > the other photo, no?
>
> No.
>
> Look at all the yellow paint on top of the nose, along the
> top of the side, the width of the stripe under the radiator
> band, and along the sill. Now, go look at the other photo.
> Virtually none of that stuff is there, as it was not on the
> as-delivered paint scheme for FTs.
So then, we have a mystery. The slide is (a) supposedly taken in 1956, and
(b) features the top of the as-delivered scheme (with the thin yellow band
under the windshield, and the lower part of a post-1946 scheme (when the
"original scheme" FTs got their full yellow bib treatment.
My guess? A Photoshop job, or some wiseacre in the paint shops having some
fun. Since this is supposed to be 1956, ten years after the "full bib"
standardization, I can't imagine this is one that "got away" and was later
partially "bibbed."
- Paul
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
http://EL-List.railfan.net/
To Unsubscribe: http://Lists.Railfan.net/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------