[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) ELHS Archives.
- Subject: (erielack) ELHS Archives.
- From: Dlw1el2_@_aol.com
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:46:53 EST
I am sure glad this has come up, for I guess I would die of old age before I
would get a personal reply from anyone on the ELHS Board of Directors,
although that still has a very high potential attached to it.
Let me explain. In the early fall ( Sept 2006 ) while reading the newest
Extra Board, (I do not have the number offhand), I read with complete
amazement that the Society had been asked to move their stuff from the University of
Akron. I will admit I do not read everything that comes in the Diamond or
the Extra Boards, but at least I try to digest most of it. I did not know that
the Society only had a 10 year lease with U of Akron. I thought the
collection was there for ever. After my initial shock, I thought that this may be a
blessing in disguise, because I've have always thought it should be in a
more railroad related environment. I had been given the "cooks tour" at
Steamtown by Pat McKnight about a year or so before this, and I was VERY impress
with both Pat and the whole facility. Separating this part of the facility from
the roundhouse and displays opened me to a completely new perspective of
Steamtown.
With these thoughts in mind, I sent an letter to each of the Directors that
I had an email address for and I asked that it be forwarded to those that I
did not have addresses for. I conveyed my thoughts on several aspects of the
Archives and, in particular my thoughts that Steamtown was the perfect match.
I won't go into any further detail here, but I have attached a copy of my
letter to the end of this email, if any one cares to read it. The only part I
will mention here is my final sentence, which asked the Board to, PLEASE KEEP
ME INFORMED. That's not what I would consider an overly outlandish request,
even if I was a first year member, and certainly not given my personal letter
to all of them, my 20 some years in the Society, and a few major Diamond
Articles thrown in for good membership behavior. But then again, the ELHS
Board never seems to learn from past mistakes, nor do they waste an opportunity
to thoroughly disgruntle good members. Year after year after year!
To there credit, I did get an initial response from Larry De Young &
Schuyler Larrabee, Which I will also enclose at the end of this Email. Larry stated
some of the positives he saw in Steamtown, and the three major negatives he
saw. In his words "The three issues that concern me are staffing, collection
ownership, and politics." Ok. Valid issues, but all the more reason I
wanted to be kept informed. Nothing in those three issues seemed to be a
mountain that couldn't be climbed or at least circumvented. With some open and frank
discussions, some compromises, and maybe some legal documents in uncharted
waters, I still had hopes that Steamtown might be considered a valid
solution to the Society's problem. As month after month passed, so did my hopes.
After 6 months of silence, other things I best not mention now occupy where
hope once was. I will admit, I missed the one paragraph in Extra Board #
82, that was recently pointed out to be the all- encompassing and all-
informing statement to members. I went and found it today and read it. Let me
simple state that having a preconceived idea about the ownership issues before
you ever walk in the door, and then stating it as you're walking out, thus
closing the door, is not what I had in mind when I came to the Board or
unfortunately a very small group of individuals, to explore the possibility of
moving the archives to Steamtown. It is one of the big reasons why I asked to
be kept informed. I don't look at, nor do I appreciate either reading or
being told of the final decision when and if it happens as being kept informed.
That's called being kept uninformed!
I just got back from my every three-day sojourn from Croxton to Harrisburg
and return, and I've been trying to read all the emails. No short order, but I
would like to touch on a few points from many of them.
To: Joe Schveder
It's going to cost to move the Archives no matter where they goes and from
what little we are told, it has to be moved.
Silence at the ELHS is not a work in progress, ITS A WAY OF LIFE!
No I don't have a membership list. Do you? Does the EL Society put one out?
My gut instinct tells me more EL fans live in NY, NJ and PA than other parts
of the country. Scranton is REAL centrally located when you look at it from
that standpoint, and the interstate highways that lead there from all
directions. If it's equally, if not more accessible at Scranton, does it really
matter where it is stored geographically? And for that matter who owns it? Are
you upset cause it's been in your back yard for 10 years, and you selfishly
don't want to loose it? And finally, I'm sorry your think all of us easterners
are cry babies and malcontents. I wonder how the rest of the eastern end of
the membership feels about that?
Ken
Your right a lot of people over the years have contributed to the Archives
fund including myself. Should there voices be heard? I think they should at
least be listened to, and maybe responded to, would be a starting point. And
yes, a lot have walked. Its incredible the number of people I know that are
Lackawanna or EL fans in a very big way, and yet they are not and will not
become members of the ELHS. There are people on this list that are not even
members.
Tom Schmeider and / or Don Barnickel
Yes, I think having all the major EL and related roads material in one spot
would be a GREAT draw, and yes I think Pat McKnight is very much aware of the
material at Syracuse. First things first but....................:)
It would also be a great draw for just individuals that want to see that
their own material winds up at the best possible location. Believe me, I've had
this discussion many times over the years, with many, individuals that
have substantial collections. Be it slides, Photos hardware, or even models,
its very troubling to pick an institution that you think is really going to
fulfill all your final wishes. We desperately need those locations, for as
Paul said, It needs to be included in everyone's WILL, and not left to be
thrown out by widows who just want it gone, or given away to tomorrows Ebay
poachers, who are the only ones that will profit.
Paul T
You ask some excellent questions that I would love to hear answers to. What
is the big problem with turning the whole thing over? Is ELHS ownership of
the Archives more important than accessibility, preservation, and
dissemination of the information to the society members and the general public? Once you
put the ego factor aside, what's the big deal. It will always be Material
that came from the ELHS and they can and should always be proud of that. The
important thing is that it stays preserved and is available to everyone. It
will then be one less headache the ELHS will have to deal with. The National
Park Service hasn't closed a National Park in the last 100 years and with all
the millions that have been poured into Steamtown, I don't think it's going
away. If for the sake of argument, we consider a worst case scenario does
anyone really think it would be put in a warehouse somewhere and not made
available to the public. I don't think so! That's one of the little things
Congressman and Senators can get straitened out pretty quick. The National
Archives would be a first choice. Also look at the excellent job the Federal
government has done with HABS/HAER material that's available on line. Paul, Your
expertise would sure come in handy if Steamtown proceeds to digitize the
Archives.
Sure Pat McKnight WILL probably go away someday, but the quicker we get
it there, the quicker it can be established under his capable guidance. This
in turn means the more assured we are that his successor will be able to
proceed under the precedent already set by Pat. Had it been there already, we
would not be discussing this now. Although the question has been asked, I
don't think I have ever heard an answer on how much of the Archives is Cataloged,
and how much isn't, but needs to be? Just another answer that needs to
addressed.
Mike Spinelli
Sorry to hear that if it left Akron tomorrow, you would be left without
Archival material, but you know, you guys have had the collection for 10 years.
Glad your willing to help move it.
Tim Stuy
What can I say? Your experience doesn't surprise me in the least.
In conclusion, the membership that's on this list has probable gotten a
better education on the Archives in the last 48 hours just by the open, (although
one sided) discussion than they have from reading all the Extra Boards over
the last three years. I would hope that the Board would chime in, open up,
and let us know what's happening from there side. I think an awful lot of
people want to know.
I have done research at the U of Syracuse, the U of Akron, the Railroad
Museum of PA at Strassburg and at Steamtown. I still think more then ever that
Steamtown is the Best solution for the ELHS Archives, its members, and for
future generations of researchers. I think that's something the ELHS Board needs
to recognize. They need to be forthright with the wishes of the members
that DO CARE, and start responding positively, and openly.
Sincerely
Robert R Bahrs
- --
- --
Dear ELHS Board of Directors Early Sept 2006
>
> I was initially shocked and dismayed when I recently read in
> the Extra Board about the Society having to remove all its
> archives from U of Akron. I guess this is the first this
> information is being made available to the general
> membership? I certainly can understand the disappointment
> the Society must feel, after finally getting all the material
> to a location that one would think is going to be its permanent home.
>
> After I thought about it a bit, I started to realize that
> this possibly could be a blessing in disguise. I have always
> thought that it should have been in more of a railroad
> related environment. That opportunity still exists and is
> open and ripe for the taking. "What I am referring to is the"
> National Park Service at Steamtown, in Scranton, PA. After
> visiting the site and getting a tour of the whole building
> several years ago I was impressed to the point where I now
> have included them in my WILL and have been actively
> promoting several other individuals to do the same.
>
> What prompted this you ask? Several things. They have a
> tremendous amount of unused space. Practically the entire
> third floor, and large parts of the second floor. This would
> be the three story building behind the shops. The first floor
> houses the NPS offices are and a large part of the archives
> they already have. The construction of the building is
> almost 98% percent ( Lackawanna:) concrete, thus the fire
> potential is almost nil. The entire building and each floor
> already has a security system in place, plus being on
> National Park Property it has the extra patrol factor. One
> VERY big plus factor is the Archivist, Pat Mc Knight who is
> doing a superb job of getting the material they already have
> cataloged. More importantly he is keenly interested in
> getting the material available to the public and having it
> used. No, Pat will not be there for ever I know, but he is
> there NOW, and is laying some excellent ground work. One of
> his biggest interest is to try and get all the Lackawanna/
> Erie/ EL material that still exists under one roof, which I
> think is a GREAT idea. Other than the Taber material at the
> RR Museum of PA at Strassburg, which is totally out of space,
> this is a very realistic endeavor. The Syracuse material
> would be much better off at Steamtown, and that will be
> addressed in time. As you read this, one of the local NRHS
> chapters is already negotiating to turn over their large
> collection of Lackawanna material to Steamtown."The ELHS has
> a tremendous opportunity to play a pivotal part in furthering
> this worthwhile endeavor."
> This would be the last move this material would ever have to
> make. There is a large amount of both Lackawanna and yes
> ERIE material already in the archives at Steamtown. You are
> probably thinking that Steamtown is all Lackawanna material,
> but that is not true. They already have there a tremendous
> amount of material on the Jefferson and Wyoming Divisions. As
> a side note there is also a large amount of Erie material at
> the U of Syracuse other than the much publicized Lackawanna
> material. Anyone on the EL Internet list knows how often Pat
> has gone out of his way to search and share with the list,
> material that is pertinent to a discussion and often that
> material has been Erie paperwork.
>
> It's highly unlikely that Steamtown would pay or even be
> involved in moving the material, but that problem exists no
> matter where the collection goes. A big plus is that a large
> ?? ( I would like to know what portion) of the U of Akron
> material has already been cataloged, and that will go a long
> way in getting us in the door at Steamtown.
>
> After reading the Extra Board, I talked with Pat on what the
> ELHS should do to get the ball rolling on this. His
> suggestion is that you write a letter to Kip Hagen,
> Superintendent Steamtown National Historical Site, 150 S
> Washington Ave, Scranton, PA 18503 expressing your interest
> in moving the Collection. I sincerely hope that the Board
> does that. If there is anything else I can do, please don't
> hesitate to ask, and I would ask that as a courtesy, you keep
> me informed of what is and is not happing with the Akron Archives.
>
> Sincerely
> Robert R Bahrs
>
> PS. I don't have Dave Mc Wherter or Bruce Fields email
> address. Please supply them with
> a copy of this.
>
======================================================================
Thanks, Bob, for your note here. Steamtown is of course a possibility.
However, it most likely
would require us to give up control of the material in the Archives, which
we are loath to do. The
fact that Steamtown is a Federal facility does NOT mean it is there for
ever, or that material
donated there will be there for ever, either.
We actually have several options to pursue with the Akron situation, which
is quite fluid. Staying
where it is could be a possible result. But Steamtown is an option which we
should consider.
Thanks for your concern. We will keep you informed.
Schuyler
=======================================================================
Bob:
Thanks for the comments and suggestion.
I was told by another ELHS member that there might be some interest on the
part of Steamtown in having our collection there. The implication I read in
that question was that if we were interested in discussing it with them (which
I said we were), then they would contact me. They have not done so.
However, I will be happy to contact them if that is appropriate. The space
situation there sounds ideal, especially if they have climate control. The location
is hard to beat for the bulk of our members. The three issues that concern
me are staffing, collection ownership, and politics. I bring up the staffing
matter because I don’t know the answer at Steamtown and have not explored it
with them, and because our very capable curator, Scott Randolph, is located
in Indiana and would be hard-pressed to travel often to Scranton as he does
to Akron. If we cannot retain ownership (or at least control) of our
collection, especially in the beginning (as we have learned quite vividly at Akron),
we do not want to place it there. This can be explored with them. Politics
concern me more, because Steamtown is a low priority in the minds of the
National Park Service, which thinks of itself in terms of places like Yosemite and
even has trouble seeing Valley Forge as part of its mission. If the
Congressional support that has kept the appropriations coming to Steamtown withers,
then we could find ourselves in trouble there, since I have read that
Steamtown would be one of the first sites the NPS would shut down if it had its own
way. None of those factors withstanding, however, I would be happy to
explore the matter with them as it could be the right place at the right time.
Larry
==========================================================================
==
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------