[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Akron Clearances
Hi Paul,
I may have been confusing in my last post, and since then I've checked a few
more ETTs. ETT No. 2, 10/25/1964, for the western divisions is the last one
that has a section 15: Overhead Clearances. For the Marion Division,
subsection 1504 has the exact same info on Akron clearances as I scanned
from ETT No. 1: 19'0" absolute maximum on the EB and 19'2" absolute maximum
on the WB, both moving slowly under observation.
Starting with ETT No. 3, 10/31/1965, for the western divisions there is no
longer an Overhead Clearances section, at all, for any of the divisions. I
wouldn't take this to mean that there were no longer any overhead clearance
issues after 1965, just that they no longer listed such in the ETTs. Hope
this clarifies it.
Best regards,
Vinnie
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Brezicki" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>
To: "EL Mailing List" <erielack_@_lists.elhts.org>; "Stephen Twarogowski"
<stwarogowski_@_windstream.net>; "Keith Robbins" <KRinMich@aol.com>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 3:51 AM
Subject: (erielack) Akron Clearances
>I know we've beaten this subject to death, but as I expected the issue has
>been resolved with an ETT. Keith Robbins informed me that his 4/27/1969 ETT
>shows no clearance restrictions through Akron. So clearances were improved
>between 1964-1969, probably by undercutting the roadbed. He may have posted
>this yesterday, but I didn't receive yesterday's Digest. Did anyone else
>not receive it? While I think about it, is there a way of reviewing the
>posts if you fail to receive the Digest? I couldn't find a link for this on
>the ELHTS website.
>
> Paul B
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> Sponsored by the ELH&TS
> http://www.elhts.org
> To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
>
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
To Unsubscribe: http://lists.elhts.org/erielackunsub.html
------------------------------