[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) Re: CWR

Why would it have made much of a racket?.  The rails were probablyon 8x8 
timbers to clear the end sheets with plenty of grease beween the rail 
and the timbers.

bob gillis


Paul Brezicki wrote:

> Yikes! That would have made an ear-splitting racket.
>
> Paul B
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" 
> <paultup_@_lucent.com>
> To: "'Paul Brezicki'" <doctorpb_@_bellsouth.net>; "EL Mailing List" 
> <erielack_@_lists.elhts.org>; "Mike Oravec" <MOEL@paonline.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:27 AM
> Subject: RE: (erielack) Re: CWR
>
>
>>> Thanks for the pics Mike, they clear up a lot of questions.
>>> It appears the rail was handled on two levels. I can't
>>> defitintely make out rollers, but they must be there.
>>
>>
>> They might have simply used sliding friction rather than rollers to 
>> get the rail off.
>
>
>
>     The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
>     Sponsored by the ELH&TS
>     http://www.elhts.org
>
>



	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------