[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) The advantages of faster intermodal
- Subject: (erielack) The advantages of faster intermodal
- From: Wdburt1_@_aol.com
- Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 17:45:34 EDT
The advantages of intermodal speed, or absence thereof, depend on the primary
geographic markets served.
In the New York-Chicago market of the 1960s and '70s, and to a (much) lesser
extent the satellite lanes to/from Boston, St. Louis, and Philadelphia, there
were advantages to schedules faster than 28-30 hours. They included:
1.) A 20-24 hour schedule could drag inside the second-morning delivery
window (on the street) those markets that required significant truck drayage.
Think Milwaukee, Rockford, Danbury, New Haven, etc. If you were NYC, you could
compete in these markets like a boxer with a longer arm than your Erie
Lackawanna opponent (or, much of the time, even the PRR).
2.) You could compete for what was called "part truck load" or "top-off"
freight--shipments that required limited consolidation at one or both ends.
These were very profitable shipments for less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers and
consolidators, who were a bigger factor then than now, and potentially high
revenue business for the railroad.
3.) If you were fast enough--and NYC's SuperVan trains were--you could
compete for at least some second morning LTL shipments. The first of these loads
emerged from consolidation terminals about midnight and needed to arrive at the
destination terminal about the same time. EL could play the game of skewing
departures or arrivals at one end to provide a generous amount of time for
LTL, but the other end departed or arrived such that it became a third morning
LTL schedule.
4.) UPS needed basically all night to consolidate the freight, although the
first shipments out of the terminal were to some degree targeted for
intermodal (as with LTL). Nobody, but nobody, could provide UPS with a second morning
schedule in this geographic market. But EL, limited to 28-30 hours, did
something smart; it skewed the schedule to serve UPS. The result--a departure that
was well suited to UPS's needs, while allowing lots of time to recover from
service problems vs. while meeting a third AM delivery standard for UPS.
A lot of the art of scheduling for domestic intermodal has been lost as this
nation's manufacturing base vanishes and we increasingly focus on moving huge
land-ships loaded with containers full of imports. I'm not sure that's what
John Kneiling had in mind when he coined that term, but it fits.
WDB
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------