[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) CWR
- Subject: RE: (erielack) CWR
- From: "Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:27:48 -0400
> Normally CWR is transported in 1/4 mile lengths on a train
> consisting of flats equipped with rectangular frames, the
> rail sits on rollers on the frame. At the installation site a
> 'dozer straddling the ties pulls each length of rail off the
> train; I think rollers are placed on the ties also. If
> shorter lengths are required they're cut at the field, since
> on the rail train they're all the same length. Gons are an
> inefficient way of transporting CWR, but evidently EL wasn't
> laying enough to justify a dedicated CWR train so they used
> gons which would return to regular steel service once the
> project was done. Another option for EL would have been to
> use another RR's CWR train on short-term lease, say N&W's
> during Dereco years, but it sounds like they didn't do that.
>
> Paul B
Which makes me wonder about the EL gon photo that Ron Dukarm posted - there seems to be no sign of "rail racks" in them. Maybe these had some sort of low-level rollers that never got above the car sides that can't be made out in these photos?
- Paul
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------