(erielack) Re: EL List Daily V3 #1955

["Bill K." <pontiac_@_dreamscape.com>]

So were the people who lived along the line, isn't that where they dumped a
number of trailers when they first started running the trains through down
there instead of on the Erie side?


At least I remember reading that somewhere, probably in a 1975 issue of
Railfan ages ago.   Seems like the routing was a little odd because it
turned out they actually could have used to have kept a portion of DL&W that
was given up for either I-80 or maybe I-280 -



Bill K.



- ----- Original Message -----
>
> >From Archives_@_Railfan.net
> Message-ID: <d4.390123b3.31487166_@_aol.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:20:06 EST
> From: STEVEZ10_@_aol.com
> Subject: Re: (erielack) Hostler's rules
>
> Steve T. & Paul,
>
> Interesting topic!
>
> I'm assuming the power that was tacked on or scheduled to lead the NY-100
in
> Chicago would be the same power all the way into Croxton?  That is my
> assumption since this seemed to be one of the hottest trains during the
mid 1970's...?
> Was the SFE-100 a time sensitive train as well??
>
> I'm quite amazed that these intermodel trains once went via the Boonton
line
> to access Croxton yard!
>
> Steve P.
>
>
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> Sponsored by the ELH&TS
> http://www.elhts.org>



- -- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.2/280 - Release Date: 3/13/2006


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------