[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) Running time on signals
- Subject: (erielack) Running time on signals
- From: Jjbchian_@_aol.com
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:13:59 EST
Rich Pennisi is correct on what he has written below. Many times I was at
Dover Tower with him as he worked second trick.
Today with no towers and CTC, if the dispatcher needs to take a signal away
from an engineer he first has to get a hold of the train to make sure the train
can be stopped safely before passing said signal. We are not talking about
automatic block signals here, but positive stop signals controlled by the
Dispatcher.
After the train has safely stopped, the dispatcher can then "pull" the light
and the signal will then show a stop indication. After "running time" on the
signal, or in EL days "grinding", the DS can then line the train for a
different route. This is the same today as back then, a safety measure to prevent the
DS from "dropping" a signal in the engineer's face. This is why there are
timing controls at Control Points, or interlockings.
It is not a good plan to "drop" a signal in an engineer's face. The rules
provide that the train must be stopped as soon as possible. Absolute good
judgment must be made by the engineer in seconds. He must consider train consist,
weight, terrain, location, whether you are in power or dynamic braking, and if a
collision is imminent. With an emergency brake application initiated by the
engineer from the head end on a long train, the usual result will be several
knuckle failures, a drawbar out, and the most severe, a derailment.
When a signal goes red it means STOP!
JJBoehner
I know on the EL the clock release was not known as a Slow Release. The
time to GRIND off the release of the signal was to prevent immediate movement of
any switches involved in a lined movement. Depending on where the signal was
physically located in the field and what it actually controlled determined the
GRIND off time. Some clocks were as short as 30 seconds. Most were 2 to 4
1/2 minutes depending on the track speed approaching the interlocking route you
were trying to change. And believe me that was the longest 2 to 4 minutes
you ever sweated out. You just knew there was going to be a delay to some
train.
Once the timer ran down, a buzzer sounded to let the operator know he could
set the signal back to the stop position. The minute the operator or
towerman dropped a signal (to show red in the field) the lever would not go back to
it's original position until the clock timer mechanism ran out. The only other
way you could restore a signal to STOP or red was to have a train pass the
signal after it was set for movement or drop the signal to stop before a train
actually was on an approach circuit.
Dover for example when signal 38 was set for an Eastbound move on track 2
(this would be the Eastbound signal at Orchard Street) you could clear the
signal to green from red any time you wanted until a train hit the approach
circuit which was around the water works west of Dover. Once that happened, if you
tried to get the signal back to STOP to re-line for a different movement, you
would need to Grind off the signal. But, and here is the big BUT, by rule you
could not take a signal away from a train that was on an approach unless you
had some kind of communication with the crew, either by radio or wayside
telephone. Without communication you couldn't be sure the engineer could stop the
train before passing the STOP signal.
Rich Pennisi
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------