We all know that steam locomotives faded from the scene on Erie and DL&W in 1953. However, steam power did not. Both the Erie and DL&W continued to use steam power in bridges, tugs, ferries, cranes, pile drivers, wreckers, ditchers, along with steam heat in buildings and passenger cars. What showed up most notably in the MOW area is that the Erie sought to convert to diesel power as quickly as it could. After WWII, the Erie had replaced all (nearly 70) steam-powered locomotive cranes with diesel- powered ones by 1954, whereas the DL&W retained theirs to the merger. In the early 50s when they both purchased new 250-ton wreckers, the Erie bought 3 diesels, but the DL&W opted to buy steam. Likewise, the Erie converted some of their steam wreckers to diesel, but the Lackawanna stayed with steam to the merger. Although I am not that familiar with their NYC marine operations, I believe the Erie took the lead in purchasing and converting tugs to diesel. My question is: why the Erie seemed to convert at a rapid pace, and the DL&W did not? It almost seemed like the DL&W was reluctant to make the conversion. Was it due to a lack of capital? Labor agreements? A steam culture? Both operated in the same major States (NY,NJ,PA) so perhaps regulatory reasons did not enter into it. Are there any other examples that support this observation? Or are there areas where the DL&W lead the Erie in conversion to diesel? Ronald R. Dukarm ELHS #532 ELHTS #66 MOW Technical Advisor rdukarm_@_adelphia.net The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2008 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.