[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) Bridge Numbering of the DL&W in Pennsylvania



On 11/2/05 12:18 PM, "Michael Mang" <mnmang_@_mn.rr.com> wrote:

> Bob, 
> 
> My 1947 ETT (no. 91) shows distances from Buffalo for eastward trains, and
> from Hoboken for westward trains. By 1957, in ETT no. 111, all distances are
> shown as to or from Hoboken even on branchlines.
> 
> Interestingly, and to provoke further confusion, clearances restrictions on
> top of trains list bridge #189.74 at Conklin (miles from Hoboken), #191.70
> Binghamton, and 193.91 also in Binghamton. Bridges on the Buffalo Division
> also appear to be numbered as miles from Hoboken.
> 
> Michael Mang
> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Mike does not say whether he is looking at/remembering a public
>> timetable or an ETT.  When did the DLW start showing distances from
>> Buffalo in the ETTs?
>> 
>> bob gillis
>> 
> 
> 
> The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
> Sponsored by the ELH&TS
> http://www.elhts.org
Michael:  The clearances you refer to are overhead bridges of which there
are probably more than undergrade bridges (Bridge 60).
    Bill Herkner


	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------