[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (erielack) Operations: EL in the 60's (2)



>Never say never.  I have photo I took just after Conrail with the NYS&W 
>1800 sitting right on that bridge waiting to make an >interchange movement. 
>At the time I was Assisitant Passenger Trainmaster and was assigned the 
>task to determine which
>buildings Conrail owned on former EL properpty that could be eliminated. I 
>was making my study when the SUSYQ showed up.

I believe that CR started actually charging for certain switching moves in 
Croxton from the start, that would have encouraged the NYS&W to do as much 
switching as possible outside Croxton, especially since the advent of CR 
killed off Marion interchange.

At some point, the NYS&W trackage was disconnected altogether and CR would 
only interchange at Passaic Jct. (anyone know the date) ?

> NYS&W interchanged with EL/Erie at Croxton Yard. NYS&W interchanged with 
> PRR originally at Marion, but due to the delays in trying to get around 
> Croxton Yard to get there, the PRR paid to build a bridge over Croxton so 
> that they could interchange with the Susquehanna in North Bergen. Note 
> that the NYS&W never used this bridge, even though it's commonly known as 
> the "Susquehanna bridge."

Not exactly.

In antediluvian times, the Midland built a single track trestle over 
Croxton; in 1887-88, it rebuilt and double-tracked the main line -- the last 
section completed being the trestle, which then became a viaduct/oron bridge 
of some complication. Keep in mind that the NYS&W still crossed the DL&W at 
grade -- at one time I believe there were as many as six tracks crossing six 
tracks -- 36 diamonds (Chicago eat your heart out!) in the plant. The NYS&W 
having been there first, the rules gave it preference, but I digress.

When the Erie opened the Archways, it finally had the capacity to take NYS&W 
passenger trains to its own terminal. The DL&W then paid to reconstruct the 
area, with a grade-crossing elimination with the NYS&W (See Tabor for 
pictures). To make **that** possible, the NYS&W viaduct was demolished, and 
serving customers at West End (and PRR interchange) then involved the move 
across Croxton.

The Erie charged the NYS&W for crossing Croxrton to meet the PRR; The NYS&W 
also charged the Erie for its moves south of Croxton to the PRR. The cost 
was more for the NYS&W, of course, as it involved pulling into the Archways 
or tunnel, then backing into Croxton, then heading down to the PRR.

The NYS&W built a new freight station/office at Marion -- known as West End 
on the NYS&W  (I always get confused when list folk here speak of West 
End -- on the NYS&W, "West End" was the eastern most point on the railroad 
in the old days <g>). It was a design similar or identical to "The Beach 
House" at Edgewater. The bridge/interchange was constructed by the 
Susquehanna and paid for with NYS&W Trustee's Certificates. There was strong 
objection from some NYS&W bondholders the assumption of new debt --  
especially from WB&E and Paterson Extension holders (the latter represented 
by the redoubtable Edith Merritt), hence the deal to keep the Viaduct "Off 
the Books" in the new company.

The Susquehanna used it daily from the time is was completed until 1953.

When the NYS&W officially emerged from bankruptcy in 1953, the bridge, its 
lead tracks, and trackage south to Marion Jct was all conveyed to the PRR. 
An interchange yard was also built north of County Line Road.

The Trustees Certificates made it into Penn Central, but were paid off by PC 
in 1969 -- not very long before the PC bankruptcy. Those Certificates, which 
included "Henry K. Norton, Trustee" on them, are among the last long term 
PRR/NYCentral obligations paid off by PC.

Cheers,
Jim Guthrie 



	The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
	Sponsored by the ELH&TS
	http://www.elhts.org

------------------------------