NOTE: This message had contained at least one image attachment. To view or download the image(s), click on or cut and paste the following URL into your web browser: http://lists.railfan.net/listthumb.cgi?erielack-08-21-05 Feb_6_67_MainBCL.jpg (image/jpeg, 850x1224 224854 bytes, BF: 4.63 ppb) I was looking at some suburban timetables today and I came across a Main / Bergen County Line timetable from Feb. 6, 1967; see attached scan of weekday trains. EL suburban service had been cut back in October, 1966, but would start to expand again in April, 67. I forgot just how bad the initial cuts were; there was very little service other than during the rush hour, except on the M&E. Compare this with today's Main Line schedule, where I count about 54 trains each way on weekdays. There is also a lot more service now on Saturdays and there's Sunday service, which didn't exist in 1967. If you were railfanning back in early '67, you could catch train 53 out to Port Jervis and then come back mid-afternoon on 58 (and probably see 3 or 4 freights on a good day). But that pre-dawn schedule was tough; if any of you did ride 53, my hat is off to you. Wish I could have, but I was 14 at the time and my mom didn't want me walking the streets from East Rutherford to Lyndhurst at 4:30 am. Parents were stricter back then, and maybe that was good. Anyway, I had to wait another year until I could ride the trains in search of freight action, and then only to Suffern (as 53 and 58 were gone by mid-68). But at least I had a few more choices as to what Suffern trains to catch by then. I wonder what we would have said if we could have glimpsed the future in 1967 and could have seen what exists and what doesn't exist today. As to the EL being gone, that wouldn't have been too surprising in 1967; we knew it just wasn't making any money. We'd probably be pleasantly surprised that passenger service made such a big comeback, but would be very dismayed about what happened to freight service. Passenger service over Moodna Viaduct would make us smile, but only until we realized that the Main Line thru Goshen and Monroe was gone. It wouldn't be too surprising to learn that a combination of the Norfolk and Western and the Southern ran what little freight service was left (we knew back then that they were powerful lines), but the concept of NYS&W through freights would astonish us. NJ Transit and Metro North wouldn't be all that surprising, since in 1967 we already knew that the government was involved with the CN, the LIRR, and the Alaska RR. The GP40 variations wouldn't surprise us too much either, as they were being delivered to the CNJ in '67. The PL42s would be pretty hard to swallow, though (passenger engine design has really been on a downward trend since the E-8). It would be comforting to know that Hoboken was still where the trains ran to (and that some sort of ferry service had returned to the Hudson River), but Secaucus Junction would seem very futuristic. As to what you young folk will see over the next 30 to 40 years -- maybe electrification in a decade or two, if world oil production starts leveling off and prices skyrocket. Perhaps freight traffic will then surge to the point that the Southern Tier Line will be relevant once more (and they will put the double track back between Port Jervis and Otisville Tunnel). But those freights - or even passenger trains -- may be running with one-man or (arg) no-man crews; the locomotives will instead have cameras and sensors monitored by someone in India or Madagascar. Will the homeland security issues lighten up so that you could go out and enjoy watching trains again, or are we heading for barbed wire and armed guards stationed along the tracks? Will all cameras used outside the home need to be registered with the government? Enough speculation -- for now, let's just be glad that we still do have passenger trains to Suffern and Port Jervis in 2005. Jim Gerofsky The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List Sponsored by the ELH&TS http://www.elhts.org ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2010 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.