[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) U34CH sound
Bill,
That's interesting that they were restricted to 55 through the Oranges,
since that was one of the few fairly long stretches of tangent track on the
line.
Chuck
bill guimes
<vze3fhdr_@_verizo
n.net> To: "Montgomery, Edward T" <Edward.Montgomery_@_fcps.edu>
cc: donald kern <doubletrack_@_comcast.net>
08/02/2005 07:30 "Tupaczewski, Paul R \(Paul\)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>
PM Lederer73_@_aol.com
s.kay4_@_verizon.net
Charles_Walsh_@_Berlex.com
erielack_@_lists.railfan.net
Subject:
Re: (erielack) U34CH sound
If I remember correctly, no, there were no blanket speed restrictions.
OOPS!!. Seem to remember that the U boats were restricted to
55 through
the Oranges. I don't remember when the speed restriction was lifted.
On the Gladstone line, all Diesels were restricted to 10 MPH
over Hog
Back Bridge, and there was a through girder bridge over a stream west of
B'ville that had a 10 MPH (IIRC) for Diesels also.
They weighed around 385,000 pounds.
Bill
Montgomery, Edward T wrote:
> Did the U34's have to run slower than the MU's on lighter rail? I know
> they were very heavy locos.
>
> Ed Montgomery
>
Be a Locomotive Engineer:
Its the most fun you can have with 3000 HP
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------