[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Slgihtly off-topic...
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Slgihtly off-topic...
- From: TrainGG1_@_aol.com
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:31:46 EDT
Looked at UP's website and found the C&EI logo (the oblong-shaped logo used
prior to absorption of the C&EI by the L&N/MP) shown. It is hard to believe
that has UP rights (or at least exclusive rights) to this logo -- would not
CSX have rights to it as well? This now begs the question, let us assume UP
allows you to use the C&EI logo -- must you also get permission from CSX before
actually using it?
That question asked, what about rights to such "predecessor" roads at the
Chicago Attica & Southern? This was part of the C&EI and was spun off years
before the UP ever even considered that C&EI might become part of its empire.
(The CA&S used a swastika for an emblem -- and no, this was years before the
swastika took on a more sinister connotation.) Can the UP lay claim to this
logo? In reading the UP's website
(_http://www.uprr.com/aboutup/licensing/index.shtml_ (http://www.uprr.com/aboutup/licensing/index.shtml) ), it states:
"Union Pacific controls the use of all modern and historic logos from Union
Pacific and constituent railroads, including logos that are not pictured on this
Web site." Well, that statement leaves a lot of room for interpretation -- and
possible litigation.
Bill Shapotkin
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------