[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Interesting DL&W "Telegrams"
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Interesting DL&W "Telegrams"
- From: Gordon Davids <g.davids_@_verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 08:29:52 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <200507040932.j649W046032424_@_net.bluemoon.net>
- References: <200507040932.j649W046032424_@_net.bluemoon.net>
I noticed that the operator at Bangor sent the telegram to the relay
office at Portland at 9.00 a.m., and the reply from New York came via
Portland at 1.00 p.m. Bangor didn't have a direct wire to New York, and
this message probably passed through one or two more relay offices on
the way over and back. The relay operators would pick up messages from
the message wire, separate from the train dispatcher's wire, and hold
them until they had a bunch to pass to another office. Portland
probably sent this with a few more to a relay operator in Hoboken, who
then sorted out the reservation messages and passed them as a bundle to
New York, maybe every hour or half hour.
The "Sent by" and "Received by" blocks on the telegram were the
telegraphers' "sines," or their individual ID's on the wire. The first
one was sent from Bangor by RAD and received at Portland by OP. OP is a
common abbreviation for "operator," so it is possible that they used a
generic sine for the "op" at Portland. The reply came back the same
way, but was received at Bangor by VA, who was probably Agent V. Arnts.
Gordon
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------