[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Steamtown 10th Anniversary
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Steamtown 10th Anniversary
- From: "Tom Beckett" <tabeckett_@_stny.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:45:02 -0400
- References: <OFBA251F86.E2D5E0DF-ON8525702F.005EE9CA-8525702F.005FAE54_@_schering.net>
Considering that the CP ex DLW line is much busier now than when they ran
the excursions years ago, it was a most generous offer on CP's part. I rode
that train a couple of times in the early 90s, and it was quite a trip. Just
think: you get a tunnel of significant length, a ride over the world's
largest steel reinforced concrete structure(and an engineering landmark),
with a stunning view to boot, and also over Martins Creek Viaduct, which is
a sizable bridge in its own right, and on a high speed main line. The
opportunity to teach the public about the importance and significance of
these engineering accomplishments while they experience them first hand is
unparalleled. I realize Steamtown has their problems, some of which are
political and unrelated to operating trains other than making such a thing a
challenge, but I think they were nuts to pass on that invitation. I will
miss the chance to get another trip on the Cutoff.
Tom B
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <Charles_Walsh_@_Berlex.com>
To: "Ken Clark" <portlandturn_@_yahoo.com>
Cc: <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net>; <erielack-owner@lists.elhts.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: (erielack) Steamtown 10th Anniversary
>
> Ken,
>
> I'll agree about it being sad, but I'm not convinced that NPS doesn't like
> it that way. When they had the minor derailment at Water Gap two years
> ago, it seemed as though it was the last straw for them. But even before
> that, they didn't really seem to know what to do with an operational
> railroad and I think they really want a static museum instead...and for
> all
> intents and purposes it looks like they're going to get their wish. One
> additional note of condemnation...as noted in TRAINS last month, CP Rail
> has said it was OK for Steamtown to run over Nicholson Viaduct, but
> Steamtown has not taken CP up on the offer. How many operating railroads
> can you name that would KILL to run a train over that bridge as a part of
> their regular excursion, not to mention on the Nicholson Cut-Off? Of
> course, when Steamtown DID run over Nicholson it experienced record
> patronage. Which only adds to my suspicion that NPS isn't the least bit
> interested in running the trains. Or they're just a bunch of idiots...or
> both.
>
> Chuck
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------