[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Passenger Train Question
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Passenger Train Question
- From: Jjbchian_@_aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:31:37 EDT
Not always the rule! Seniority ruled, yes, but the passenger daily rate paid
much less then freight. At that time, the basic day for working passenger was
150 miles, while freight was at 100. Freight paid much better then passenger,
so many senior men remained on freight, rather then take a substantial cut in
pay working passenger. When I rode No. 6 from Chicago on Dec 29, 1969, the men
assigned to work that assignment out of Chicago and Marion could hardly be
labeled "Senior Men".
JJBoehner
>
> SENIORITY RULED!!! If you were senior, you bid on -- and got -- whatever
> job you wanted. Since passenger was easier than freight, they were already
> senior. When passenger came off, the lowest ones on the board suffered as
> everybody moved down however many notches it took to get there.
>
The Erie Lackawanna Mailing List
Sponsored by the ELH&TS
http://www.elhts.org
------------------------------