[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) Ghost Train
Perhaps my point is that I'd rather err on the side of being inclusionary
rather than seeing someone blasting away at a previous email because it
didn't meet their personal criteria for relevance. If the subject is of
interest there will be additional emails; if not, there will be silence.
That's democracy.
Chuck
"Paul R. Tupaczewski"
<paultup_@_optonline.ne
t> To: Charles_Walsh_@_Berlex.com
Sent by: "'rslate'" <rslate_@_frontiernet.net>
erielack-owner_@_lists. cc: erielack@lists.railfan.net
railfan.net Subject:
RE: (erielack) Ghost Train
04/05/2005 11:09 AM
Please respond to
"Paul R. Tupaczewski"
I wouldn't go THAT far to say "ANY" rail-related subject. A certain degree
of levity is offered, but we'd like to stick to the topic of the list - EL
and predecessors (and the Ghost Train story did involve the Erie)...
- Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: erielack-owner_@_lists.railfan.net
> [mailto:erielack-owner_@_lists.railfan.net] On Behalf Of
> Charles_Walsh_@_Berlex.com
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 10:35 AM
> To: rslate
> Cc: erielack_@_lists.railfan.net; erielack-owner@lists.railfan.net
> Subject: Re: (erielack) Ghost Train
>
>
>
> I think any rail-related subject can be discussed here. I
> personally find the Ghost Train story fascinating.
> Reportedly people used to wait each year for the "train" to
> come by, and even in places where the track had been
> realigned the train followed the old alignment. Apparently
> too many people saw the train to dismiss it as a figment of
> someone's imagination.
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "rslate"
>
>
> <rslate_@_frontiernet.n
>
>
> et> To:
> <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net>
>
> Sent by: cc:
>
>
> erielack-owner_@_lists. Subject:
>
>
> railfan.net Re:
> (erielack) Ghost Train
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 04/01/2005 01:25 AM
>
>
> Please respond to
>
>
> "rslate"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I didn't start this subject. I just added that I had also
> heard the story and that it was supposed to be in Illinois,
> not in the East. If you don't want to read it don't open it.
> Seems you are the one with a little to much time on your
> hands and can only figure out how to have an attitude problem. Ron
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "timothy heckman" <chunk1_@_msn.com>
> To: <rslate_@_frontiernet.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 9:44 PM
> Subject: RE: (erielack) Ghost Train
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Tim Heckman
> > ELHS#2571
> > MP 35 DAYTON HILL 2.5% GRADE STEEPEST ON ERIE
> >
> >
> > YOU
> >
> > >From: "rslate" <rslate_@_frontiernet.net>
> > >Reply-To: "rslate" <rslate_@_frontiernet.net>
> > >To: <erielack_@_lists.railfan.net>
> > >Subject: (erielack) Ghost Train
> > >Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:14:31 -0500
> > >
> > >Here is a short article I found on the net about the ghost
> train Ron
> > >
> > >One of the most famous ghost trains has been seen by hundreds in
> Illinois.
> > >When Lincoln, who openly had seances at the White House
> died in 1865
> > >his body was transported on a special funeral train. Now
> every year
> > >on that anniversary his ghost train is seen slowly going down the
> > >tracks. It's
> said
> > >to be manned by skeletons with an entourage of blue coated men
> > >walking behind.
> > >
> > GOT ANY PICTURES? HAVE YOU SEEN THIS? MY REAL QUESTION
> IS WHAT DOES
> THIS
> > SUBJECT HAVE TO TO WITH THE ERIE OR LACKAWANNA? OR BOTH?
> SEEN ELVIS
> > LATELY?MAYBE RON HAS A LITTLE TOO MUCH TIME ON HIS HANDS AND CAN'T
> > FIGURE OUT WHAT TO DO. OR WHY DON'T YOU AND RON EMAIL THIS BETWEEN
> > YOURSELF AND STOP FILLING UP MY INBOX WITH THINGS THAT ARE
> NOT BASED
> > IN RELATITLY TIM HECKMAN ELHS 2571
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.2 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
>
>
- --
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.2 - Release Date: 4/5/2005
------------------------------