Ken, This not only makes sense from a safety issue but the cost to the company is greatly reduced when necessary modifications are made before the equipment goes into service. Steve > From: Erie910 <erie910_@_fastmail.fm> > Reply-To: Erie910 <erie910_@_fastmail.fm> > Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:27:06 -0500 > To: bill guimes <vze3fhdr_@_verizon.net> > Cc: Steven Kay <s.kay4_@_verizon.net>, "Gary R. Kazin" <gkazin@yahoo.com>, > "RJFlei_@_aol.com" <erielack@lists.railfan.net>, NJT > <newjerseytransit_@_yahoogroups.com> > Subject: Re: (erielack) NJT PL42 > > If these were locomotives which I were to run, I'd rather that they be > tested thoroughly and any safety issues cleaned up before the were put > into regular service. > > > Ken Bush > > ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2008 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.