Re: (erielack) NJT PL42

[Steven Kay <s.kay4_@_verizon.net>]

Ken,
This not only makes sense from a safety issue but the cost to the company is
greatly reduced when necessary modifications are made before the equipment
goes into service.

Steve


> From: Erie910 <erie910_@_fastmail.fm>
> Reply-To: Erie910 <erie910_@_fastmail.fm>
> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:27:06 -0500
> To: bill guimes <vze3fhdr_@_verizon.net>
> Cc: Steven Kay <s.kay4_@_verizon.net>, "Gary R. Kazin" <gkazin@yahoo.com>,
> "RJFlei_@_aol.com" <erielack@lists.railfan.net>, NJT
> <newjerseytransit_@_yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: (erielack) NJT PL42
> 
> If these were locomotives which I were to run, I'd rather that they be
> tested thoroughly and any safety issues cleaned up before the were put
> into regular service.
> 
> 
> Ken Bush
> 
> 

------------------------------