[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Fw: (erielack) Re: Erie preserved steam



I  have wondered this as well - and I think it was no more insidious than at
the time steam engines were just obsolete pieces of capital equipment. Our
company buys multimillion dollar printing
presses - and scraps them every ten or fifteen years. Someone would be
laughed at if they suggested saving one for the viewing of some future
industrial historians. Most companies wouldn't preserve old capital
equipment anymore than most of us have kept a '74 Impala in the back yard
for the enjoyment of future generations.

We view the steam engine from the romantized viewpoint of an enthusiast,
Erie management of the early '50's didn't view the late steam as any
different from the old 4-4-0s, or even the unique L-1 Angus and P-1 Triplex
locomotives. They all went to  the scrap heap when they could no longer help
the bottom line.

I think a related question is did any of the on-line communities or
contemporary railfan organizations attempt to purchase an Erie steamer or
have one donated? Would the railroad have said no if someone offered the few
thousand dollars in scrap value to have bought a K-5 or S-3?

The Erie dieselized early - I think a few years later as steam began to
become rare a lot more people, railroad insiders and fans,  began to realize
an important part of history was slipping away and the interest in
preservation was heightened. If steam could have held on in Erie a few more
years....

To go back to a thread from earlier this year - If I had a time machine and
a few bars of gold to take back with me to the early 1950's, Erie's 2925 and
3376 might be in my backyard today....

Dan Conrad
ELHS #1974

> In a message dated 10/2/2004 9:52:42 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
> curtis.brookshire_@_verizon.net writes:
>
>
>  And how did the Erie end up preserving no steam locomotives?
>   >>
>

------------------------------