Jamie, Paul and list: I have compared the lettering on Microscale sheet 87-812 with the numbers on a numbered unit. While both lettering is the same height (~.120", or roughly 10 1/2 scale inches) the Microscale numbers are more condensed. Also, the "fat" part of the numbers (don't know the correct calligraphic term here) on the numbered Atlas units is "fatter" than the Microscale numbers. I mention this only in the name of comparison, and not as a slight to either firm. Just so you can make an informed decision. I have no idea which font is correct; I leave that to the lettering gurus. I think the Microscale numbers would look fine on an unnumbered unit, since they would stand alone. If one were trying to RE-number a NUMBered unit by removing only ONE number, then there might be a problem. And Paul addressed the possible solution for an EL version ;^) Jim Harr ELHS #2934 Editor, From The Workbench From: "Evans, Jamie" <Jamie.Evans_@_dgs.ca.gov> Subject: (erielack) H16-44 numbers Hello Listers, Does anyone know who makes the correct decals for numbering the unnumbered Atlas H16-44? Maybe a microscale steam set? Thanks in advance, Jamie Evans ELHS 3087 For DL&W, the Microscale DL&W set will work. For the EL ones, the only correct set I know of is (plug, plug!) Prime Mover Decals PMD-025 - this is for gray/maroon/yellow diesels, but it has the correct cab-side yellow numbers (condensed Gothic) ------------------------------
This HTML page is © 2000-2009 Blue Moon Online System and The Railfan Network
This page and the data contained therein may not be reproduced
for any form of commercial use without the explicit permission
of J. Henry Priebe Jr. or his duly authorized agent.