[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) DL&W FT Differentiation (Reprise)
- Subject: Re: (erielack) DL&W FT Differentiation (Reprise)
- From: "Michael Connor" <mjconnor_rr_@_hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 16:18:17 +0000
Good information. Was the practice the same on the Scranton Division
pushers and the Buffalo Division pushers (i.e. Groveland Hill)? M J Connor
>From: RAILDATA_@_aol.com
>Reply-To: RAILDATA_@_aol.com
>To: lilesj_@_squared.com, erielack@lists.railfan.net
>Subject: Re: (erielack) DL&W FT Differentiation (Reprise)
>Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:39:22 EDT
>
>The Lackawanna operated their FT "pushers" backwards, ot that is with the B
>unit pushing against the caboose and the cab facing downgrade. That way
>they
>did not have to be reverse at the top of the grade. Certainly did look
>strange.
>
>They did this when they first got them and all the years I saw them.
>
>Chuck Yungkurth
>Boulder CO
>
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
------------------------------