Re: (erielack) Topics

["Schuyler G Larrabee" <sgl2_@_ix.netcom.com>]

> >Subject: Re: (erielack) New NJT Fares
> >
> >As a successor railroad to E-L, it is in a way.
> >
> >Michael Sheehy
>
> Well said.  We wouldn't be taking about the Water Gap or Scranton service
> or any of the short line operating a small section of xEL track if the
list
> was restricted to historical EL operations.  Nothing post-1976 would
> qualify.  So can we give it a rest?
>
> Dale

Well, no, I wouldn't like to "give it a rest."  The list is NOT about Water
Gap service, or service to Scranton, or fares on the NJT in 2002, all of
which I would like to see go away from the erielack list.  It >>>IS<<<
restricted to historical EL operations.  That's what Paul has said.

Isn't there some other list about NJT?  Can't those messages go there?

I get a hundred or so emails a day related to trains in one form or another.
I'd like the lists to which I subscribe to limit their traffic to the topics
the list is set up for - that's what I asked for when I joined in.

Now, can we >>get back to the EL,<< and give this topic a rest?

SGL

------------------------------

End of EL List Daily V3 #500
****************************