[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
(erielack) Interlockings and Terminology
- Subject: (erielack) Interlockings and Terminology
- From: A Samostie <quahog_@_sprint.ca>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:02:40 -0800
Dear Group,
OK, this isn't specifically an EL-related question, but since the thread
on interlockings is running concurrently, I hope y'all can help define
some general railroad terminology.
Just what makes an interlocking an interlocking (as opposed to a
junction, a diamond, etc.)?
I know that many "interlockings" were controlled by towers, and the
various switches and signals were thrown by lever-actuated sheave
cables. But, many interlockings did not have towers. For example...
Warbasse Jct. (DL&W Sussex Branch crossing NYSW mainline, referred to as
Hyper-Humus by NYSW). Were there any interchange tracks at Warbasse, or
just a simple diamond crossing? If just a diamond crossing, why was
this minor crossing called an interlocking? There WERE sheave cables
that connected the Lackawanna lower quadrant semaphores and the tilt
board (later smashboard) on the NYSW -- is it the presence of cables
that make it an interlocking?
But, in some cases, where a branch joins a main line, it's referred to
as an interlocking, where I thought it would have been called a
junction. Or, on Erie and DL&W, was the term "junction" only used to
refer to an interchange with another railroad (e.g. B&O Jct., Andover
Jct.)?
Also, in some places, a crossover is referred to as an interlocking.
Why?
Does there have to be more than one switch to constitute an
interlocking? (Obviously, a hand-thrown switch to a spur or siding
isn't an interlocking)!
Cheers,
Alan <quahog_@_sprint.ca>
------------------------------