Re: (erielack) M&E inappropriate?

["Michael Dye" <luxpan_@_hotmail.com>]

While I'm not really a party to the "Ongoing discussion", might I still 
voice an opinion?

As I understand it, this list's main purpose is to disseminate information 
on the Erie/DL&W/EL. In this light, information concerning the continued 
usage of former EL trackage would be applicable. However, the details of the 
non-EL locomotives used would NOT be. Still, there is room for minor 
deviations, so long as there is SOME connection and the deviation is 
short-lived.

Still, this is just one man's opinion. However, seeing as how Paul and Co. 
are the 'moderators' of this list, it strikes me that he/they are the final 
arbitrators on what is or is not pertinent.

Please excuse my violation.

Michael Dye ELHS #1516


>From: David Ross <MntainView_@_compuserve.com>

>Listcop Paul defended himself vigorously.....

[Big snip!]

>Since I am a Digest subscriber, I have not had the opportunity to view
>these divergent opinions, assuming they were posted to the list.  I am
>certainly willing to yield to the wish of the listmembers.  Since the
>relevance of the M&E to this list was a previous topic, and since I find 
>your distinctions of news interest impossible to discern, I would suggest 
>that the question be opened to discussion.
>
>Nothing personal.
>
>Dave Ross
>Cliffside Park, NJ (USA)




_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

------------------------------