Re: (erielack) Diamond and USPS delays(2)

["Michael Dye" <luxpan_@_hotmail.com>]

Rich,

I thought that might be the case. No problem.

I'd like to say that I wasn't bringing that up to be slamming you (As a few 
list members have sugggested in direct emails to me [?!]). Rather, I'm still 
not totally up-to-speed with the operations of the 'east end', and was 
trying to rule out the possibility that there might have been a market for 
coal that might have been moved in covered hoppers (Powdered coal?) on that 
end.

Again, many thinks for your time and effort in producing the 'The Diamond'. 
While the future issues may be professionally done, I can't help but feel 
that they will be missing something with your absence.

Michael Dye ELHS #1516



>From: RBehre8599_@_aol.com
>Michael,
>Correct you are - what happened was that the printer provided the incorrect
>draft of the description which was the only change to be made on the final
>review draft, but for whatever reason, didn't correct it as I hand 
>indicated,
>and it went to press uncorrected...sorry 'bout that (and my apologies to 
>Ray).
>
>Rich Behrendt
>ELHS #384
>
>
>In a message dated 12/18/2001 5:57:07 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>luxpan_@_hotmail.com writes:
>
><< Just one question concerning the current issue of the "Diamond". The
>caption
>  for the top photo on the rear cover states that the pictured train is a
>  "...loaded coal train, having come off the B&O at Carrolton, PA...". Now, 
>am
>  I missing something, or is there an error? Coal train? With covered 
>hoppers?
>  I'm assuming that it's just a typo. >>




_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

------------------------------