[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: (erielack) More calendar faux pas....
- Subject: RE: (erielack) More calendar faux pas....
- From: "Tupaczewski, Paul R (Paul)" <paultup_@_lucent.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 15:00:23 -0400
Al,
Yes, and now my memory is clicking in, you're right on both
accounts. Which shoots down the calendar caption once again! :)
- Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AL TILLOTSON [mailto:CPLNAJT_@_NJTRANSIT.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:52 PM
> To: erielack_@_lists.railfan.net
> Subject: Re: (erielack) More calendar faux pas....
> Sensitivity: Confidential
>
>
> Wasn't it 1974, and thereafter the trains went via Utica?
>
> >
> >Other thoughts that came to my mind:
> >
> >1. They mention that "pool power from the PC" was used in
> NE97 and NE74.
> >That's fine. But that pool power usually never went west
> past Port Jervis,
> >did it not?
> >2. The PC pool power stopped in *1972* when the Poughkeepsie
> Bridge burned!
> >For that matter, did NE97 or NE74 come off the road as well,
> or did they
> >continue via a different routing?
>
------------------------------