[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (erielack) Tower Designations
- Subject: Re: (erielack) Tower Designations
- From: The Jordans <"pamela_@_blast.net">
- Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 15:29:27 -0400
My Opinion:
If the tower was operated by Erie, D.L & W., and/or Erie Lackawanna or
controlled crossings that effected these railroads, it should be included
in the list. Let's say a particular tower was manned by the B&O, but
controlled EL movements and issued train orders to EL crews, at a crossing
of the two railroads. Shouldn't it be included???
Other opinions????
No one answered my other question; ie., are these strictly towers or are
there station designations mixed in??? Anybody know???
- -Joe Jordan
At 12:00 PM 5/26/99 EDT, "TrainGG1_@_aol.com" wrote:
>Impressive list. A few questions need to be asked. Do we include towers
>which were strickly E or E-L, or do non-Erie towers (State Line in Hammond)
>also count? Being at the west end of the railroad, this would mean
inclusion
>of Griffith, North Judson and a number of others. What do you fellows think?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net
>
>
Joe Jordan
mailto: "pamela_@_blast.net"
http://www.blast.net/pamela for the Jordan Comedy Network &
http://TrainNut.Railfan.net/ for the Train Nut Central page
------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the erielack photopage at http://el-list.railfan.net
------------------------------